Bear food
Ljubljana TV Interview
University of Ljubljana
(Click on any Image to see a higher resolution version)
|
|
As Maureen wrote about in her last entry, our visit is timely because
there is a politically charged situation and people are looking for arguments
that would bolster their particular side of the fray. We are able to shore
up the bear's side a bit. About a month ago a farmer was walking in the
woods and came upon a female brown bear with cubs and his dog ran ahead
to bark at the bears; a very typical situation to get into trouble. The
bear ran at the dog, the dog ran back to his master and got behind him
and the bear attacked the farmer. He was in the hospital for ten days,
and it was enough of an incident to get many people upset and started
on an anti conservation campaign. As is the circumstances in North America,
there is zero tolerance for this particular happening. There have been
only three deaths and 14 injuries in Slovenia in the last 50 years and
even this remarkably small number is totally unacceptable. With the same
attitude as we have in Canada, no one complains about the 500 deaths each
year with automobile accidents in this country and the many other acceptable
ways to kill oneself. But even one person being hurt by a bear due to
carelessness, creates a media stir beyond common sense, especially when
it is so understandably the result of a bear defending its cubs.
There is keen interest but extreme polarization about issues regarding
their bears. I think people are finding my presentations quite interesting
because I can talk to the farmers with some authority having ranched in
grizzly country for eighteen years. Also being raised in a hunting family
gives me some insight into that culture as well. The hunters here are
legislated into having to hunt from a high stand over bait. Anything else
is considered too dangerous. That bit I don't understand. It would seem
to me that when it comes to taking another animals life, the hunter should
have honor enough to even the odds by sharing some risk. A high powered
rifle you would think is enough one sided odds without bating and shooting
from high stand.
We were taken to one of these stands by hunter in charge of a large
area. There were many bear tracks but the bears are shy and nocturnal
having been hunted for many years. As one of the photos shows, this hunter
was feeding his bears. He said that even though many bears did not hibernate
this past winter due to warm weather and no snow, they do not eat very
much for several months. Careful questioning suggested that no dangerous
bear problems are created as a result of this feeding. The hunters say
that it solves many problems such as keeping bears away from populated
areas and out of farmers crops at critical times not to mention helping
them through times when there is a failure of natural berry crops and
the like. The non hunters say that it is mostly done by hunters to control
their movements and gives the hunters a unfair advantage.
I have a short video taken by a rancher friend near my place in Alberta
showing bears, wolves and cattle interaction. Even I can't take my eyes
off some of the scenes he captured over a period of several years on various
ranches near Waterton Lakes Park. One part of the video shows a big female
and her yearling cub eating a dead cow, which died earlier of natural
causes, while other cows and calves graze calmly within a few feet of
the bears. Another scene is of a wolf walking through cows, their calves
and horses. The cow barely even glance at the wolf while chewing their
cuds. Despite centuries of people bear history here, these people seem
to also never observe how predators and livestock really interact, so
this has been a real hit, even though the farmers don't seem to trust
what they are seeing.
The slide presentation of us living with bears in Kamchatka also has
credibility problems with some people. During a 70 minute TV debate we
were asked to participate in with a local wildlife expert and a university
professor, the expert described what he saw of our experiences in Russia
as a fairy tale. This got Maureen's ire up a notch and when she got through
with him, he was defiantly more careful as to the terms by which he described
what he saw. It seems that no mater how much background history people
have with bears, it has never occurred to them to have a fair look at
whether these animals are as terrible as they are always depicted. When
they see our slides of how bears like Brandy accept us and even adapt
to us being trustworthy enough to baby-sit her cubs for a while, I too
can understand their incredulousness. The neat thing is that these people
want to hear what we have to say and have gone to great trouble and expense
to bring us here. They have lived with many bears for a long time and
seem determined to solve the problems that arise from an ever-increasing
human population.
I am doing my last presentation this afternoon and fly home tomorrow.
Maureen's and my trails diverge to Frankfurt. She is off to Paris for
another exibition.
- Charlie
.. Charlie held 4 lectures in different parts of Slovenia to different
peoples who are in one way or other conected to bear problems (farmers,
rangers in Triglav National park, experts, politicians, hunters, conversationist,
students, profesors
.) The response of each lecture was very positive
and I think most of the audience was willing to accept experiences Charlie
and Maureen bring in Slovenia. It is very important that audience was
compounded with higly responsible people who have direct influence to
our government.
Therefore I am convinced that Charlies and Maureens visit
took an important part in process of understanding, preserving and improving
bear population in Slovenia
..
Matevz Lenarcic
|